Does WareBee replace our finance, billing or accounting system?

No — treat any claim that a single tool replaces finance with suspicion. WareBee is not an accounting system, a billing or invoicing platform, an ERP, or a source of financial assurance, and it doesn't produce statutory figures. What it gives you is the activity evidence: an event ledger of every putaway, pick, pack and dock touch, attributed to the client and contract that generated it. Your finance team takes that ledger and does what it does with it — WareBee gives that function something to work from, it doesn't stand in for it.

How is cost attributed to a single order, client or contract?

Every putaway, pick, pack and dock touch is logged against the client and contract that generated it as it happens, rather than pooled into a shift total and spread later as an overhead percentage. That's activity-based costing down to single events, so a cost figure for one order, one client or one contract can be traced back to the events that produced it instead of assumed from an average applied across the client base.

What does 'unbilled work' actually look like in the data?

It's extra handling, an additional storage day, or a value-add service that was performed on the floor and logged as activity, but never matched against the client's rate card before the invoice went out. WareBee audits billable activity against contract terms continuously, so that gap between what happened and what was invoiced surfaces on its own, rather than being found — or missed — during a manual reconciliation days before month-end close.

Can a new contract be priced before we commit space and labour to it?

Yes. Sales hands over a prospect's order file and the digital twin runs it through your existing racking, dock schedules and shared labour pools, showing where the new volume collides with current clients' peaks before anything is committed. The rate card and the onboarding date both rest on a floor plan that's already been tested against your real operation, rather than a rule of thumb applied to a stated volume.

What data does WareBee need to start measuring cost to serve?

WareBee starts from data you already generate — WMS or ERP activity feeds, item and location data, and each client's contract terms, whether as a live feed, a scheduled export or a plain CSV upload. There's no separate billing database to build and no bespoke integration required before the first cost-to-serve analysis can run on your own operation and your own contracts.

How do cost-to-serve findings reach the people who need to act on them?

Findings route to whoever owns the number — a billing team sees flagged unbilled activity before the invoice goes out, and a commercial or account team sees the event ledger behind a client's margin, ready to open in a renewal conversation instead of a spreadsheet estimate. Because the underlying activity is logged continuously, the record behind any finding already exists rather than being rebuilt from scratch when someone finally asks.

Get started Login

Common challenges

You don't know what an orderreally costs.

Cost to serve gets estimated once a quarter and spread across clients as an overhead percentage, so every renewal conversation starts from a guess instead of a number. The fix isn't a bigger spreadsheet — it's knowing exactly what each putaway, pick, pack and dock touch cost, and which client or contract it belongs to.

See warehouse analytics

WareBee cost-to-serve breakdown attributing putaway, pick, pack and dock activity to the order and contract that generated it

Is this your problem?

How to tell a real margin problem from a spreadsheet estimate.

The measure that separates them is simple to ask and hard to answer from most finance stacks: can you point to what a single order cost to fulfil, or trace a month's activity to the client and contract that generated it? If the honest answer is that cost only exists as an overhead percentage applied evenly across every client, you don't have a cost-to-serve number — you have an allocation, and it can't tell a lean contract from one that's quietly losing money.

It happens because activity data and billing data live in different places and get reconciled rarely, if at all. A pick, a pack, an extra dock touch or a value-add service happens on the floor and gets logged, if it's logged at all, against a task list rather than against the client and contract that caused it. By the time margin comes up in a renewal conversation, nobody can trace the number back to the events that produced it, so the conversation runs on a spreadsheet estimate instead of the activity itself.

WareBee sets your cost-to-serve figures against a peer set matched on order profile, SKU count and footprint — never an industry median — so 'that contract feels thin' stops being a feeling and becomes an event ledger you can open, question and act on.

What's actually causing it

Five places the margin goes missing.

Each one is measured on your digital twin from data you already generate, so you can see which applies to you before the next renewal conversation.

Cost spread as overhead

Every client pays the same allocated percentage, whether their contract is cheap to serve or expensive.

A flat overhead split treats a client with easy pallet-in, pallet-out flow the same as one with heavy value-add and constant exceptions. The contract that's actually thin never stands out, because the allocation was never built to show it.

Activity not logged against the contract that caused it

A pick, a pack or a dock touch happens on the floor without carrying the client or contract it belongs to.

Without that link, activity data and billing data describe the same day from two directions that never meet. Every putaway, pick, pack and dock touch needs to be logged against the client and contract that generated it, not folded into a shift total.

Billable work never invoiced

Extra handling, storage days and value-add services get performed and then quietly missed at billing.

If nobody matches what happened on the floor against the rate card before the invoice goes out, work that should have been billed simply isn't. It's not fraud or carelessness — it's activity with no system watching for it.

Margin argued from spreadsheets

When a renewal turns to profitability, the numbers on the table are an estimate, not a record.

Whoever built the spreadsheet is trusted more than the data behind it, because there's no event ledger to open instead. The conversation settles on whoever argues more confidently rather than on what actually happened.

New contracts priced without modelling

A prospect's volume gets a rate card before anyone checks whether it fits the space and labour you already have committed.

Sales hands over the numbers and pricing follows a rule of thumb rather than a floor plan that's been tested against current clients' peaks. The contract that looked profitable on paper starts colliding with existing racking and dock schedules within its first busy week.

See 3PL cost to serve →

Open the event ledger instead of arguing from a spreadsheet.

WareBee logs every putaway, pick, pack and dock touch against the client and contract that generated it, rather than spreading it as an overhead percentage. That gives you activity-based costing down to single events — a cost to serve you can trace back to the order it came from, not an average applied across the client base.

The same event data audits billable activity against contract terms, so extra handling, storage days and value-add services that happened on the floor but never made it onto an invoice surface before the invoice goes out. And when a prospect's order file lands on your desk, the digital twin runs it through your existing racking, dock schedules and shared labour pools, so a new contract is priced against what your operation can actually absorb, not a rule of thumb. WareBee's own operational cost saving band is 10–15% — deliberately a range rather than a single confident figure, since pricing, staffing and slotting decisions each pull differently once they rest on the event ledger instead of an estimate.

Activity-based costing down to single events, by client and contract
Billable activity audited against contract terms — unbilled work caught before invoicing
A prospect's volume simulated against real racking, docks and labour before it's priced

See warehouse analytics

WareBee cost-to-serve ledger showing activity-based costs by client and contract alongside unbilled-work findings

Next step

Cost to serve, answered.

Does WareBee replace our finance, billing or accounting system?
No — treat any claim that a single tool replaces finance with suspicion. WareBee is not an accounting system, a billing or invoicing platform, an ERP, or a source of financial assurance, and it doesn't produce statutory figures. What it gives you is the activity evidence: an event ledger of every putaway, pick, pack and dock touch, attributed to the client and contract that generated it. Your finance team takes that ledger and does what it does with it — WareBee gives that function something to work from, it doesn't stand in for it.
How is cost attributed to a single order, client or contract?
Every putaway, pick, pack and dock touch is logged against the client and contract that generated it as it happens, rather than pooled into a shift total and spread later as an overhead percentage. That's activity-based costing down to single events, so a cost figure for one order, one client or one contract can be traced back to the events that produced it instead of assumed from an average applied across the client base.
What does 'unbilled work' actually look like in the data?
It's extra handling, an additional storage day, or a value-add service that was performed on the floor and logged as activity, but never matched against the client's rate card before the invoice went out. WareBee audits billable activity against contract terms continuously, so that gap between what happened and what was invoiced surfaces on its own, rather than being found — or missed — during a manual reconciliation days before month-end close.
Can a new contract be priced before we commit space and labour to it?
Yes. Sales hands over a prospect's order file and the digital twin runs it through your existing racking, dock schedules and shared labour pools, showing where the new volume collides with current clients' peaks before anything is committed. The rate card and the onboarding date both rest on a floor plan that's already been tested against your real operation, rather than a rule of thumb applied to a stated volume.
What data does WareBee need to start measuring cost to serve?
WareBee starts from data you already generate — WMS or ERP activity feeds, item and location data, and each client's contract terms, whether as a live feed, a scheduled export or a plain CSV upload. There's no separate billing database to build and no bespoke integration required before the first cost-to-serve analysis can run on your own operation and your own contracts.
How do cost-to-serve findings reach the people who need to act on them?
Findings route to whoever owns the number — a billing team sees flagged unbilled activity before the invoice goes out, and a commercial or account team sees the event ledger behind a client's margin, ready to open in a renewal conversation instead of a spreadsheet estimate. Because the underlying activity is logged continuously, the record behind any finding already exists rather than being rebuilt from scratch when someone finally asks.